special interview ( must read )

The Prime Minister's resignation is not appropriate: UML leader Shankar Pokharel (interview)

- | Shankar Pokharel, leader, UML

UML-led coalition government partner, the Maoists began to exercise the option to build alliances with its leadership of the national politics of famine again. Grhakaryasameta for future government began keeping the current government has led the UML thinking? Ratopatile leader Shankar pokharelasamga part of the conversation:

Integrated co-operate todiekoejasto suddenly appeared? This sudden that natural?

Surely it is accidental, mysterious and shocking. We are still in the Maoist leadership to start 16-point agreement of national pride we're asking for a trip to avoid being overwhelmed. The weakness of his leadership of the Nepali Congress in the past felt by those pledging their agreement with the request to return. As far as the UCPN natural that the current step that is unusual, formed their own initiative once hated the government policies and programs and to seek to remove without bringing bajetasamma and more its claim to leadership is what aphamaile any sense be considered natural.

shankar-pokharel-lele_20130513093049 hybrid This alliance was a long collaboration. Seven months had trap? It is the responsibility be measured?

The answer can then Maoist friends. Dahal days ago to remove a government are being invisible game, we said it was not the will by no means be successful. Today he is the change of government itself becoming a pawn. This Vivi is mysterious. Therefore, the answer is to take the responsibility and he is.

The second largest party in the coalition government led by the UCPN-M to make a statement issued after he walked away from the government before. Now that happens to the resignation of the Prime Minister?

Government is supposed to be removed from any political parties that claim to leadership may not be identical. Moreover, the UML standing committee today that the formation of a consensus government really looking statements. Sanctions have faced, the Movement uncomfortable situation to a certain extent in order to make work and to China transport and transport agreements and transmission line construction agreement and the national capacity to increase the success and people's welfare popular budget preparations the government to remove the sadyantrasvarupa from step a simple way to take and resignation that not appropriate.

-This Accidental, mysterious and shocking

- The party is not in favor of dissolution of parliament

The government does not seem to be a likely sahamatiko

Corner-UML came to reckoning

True dherai could not work

The motion of the votes and the faith that they have done and to try to process the work of the public, it is appropriate to take the leadership of the current government may try. UCPN-looking statement, he seems to quit the government. However, the withdrawal of his support and ministers to resign unless the same thing as may be overestimated. Moreover, taking into consideration his reaction to foster vijnaptipachi place Review is also usakasamu. How he comes to the future and move forward in line with the government's step is appropriate.

Some dissolution of Parliament by the Prime Minister to call elections can madhyavadhi is heard, that is not what has been originally divided into UML. It seems likely?

The UML cadres love and generous tips. However, the party is not in favor of dissolution of parliament. UML agenda for political stability. Representatives to various external power khojdarahechan how to play well, too, that we have learned from the past, pledging. Thus, the dissolution of parliament that the prime minister does not preach the truth. If consensus would be faster, but the election is the Constitution can be reached.

Prime Minister Deuba politics course is subverted by Prachanda offer. UML is now step in?

The desire of the Prime Minister would not only be the responsibility of the party could have anyway. The Roadmap itself for its acceptance was necessary kudihimdnu grow.

Prime Minister Prachanda, CPN-UML once banaunegari initiatives are underway itself seems likely to reverse course?

16-point consensus to move forward the foundation of faith for him to be ready to create an environment that is not impossible to think about. To forge a solid consensus for the implementation of the new constitution in order to take the initiative if the question of the leadership of the UML is open. However, 16-point agreement and the constitution, the manufacturing process has raised the endangered weak banaunegari any proposal can not be said to UML partner.

You are likely to see Prachanda said in a national government?

The way the government has to change now, it was the party that received the public support has been defused psychology. Leaders around the pressure and intimidation brought pieces. Such a situation does not seem any chance of a national consensus government. Instead, the external aspects of this event will take the role of Nepali politics increased sense. From the historic agreement with China, and will work in implementing the Constitution that trouble. Parliament converted avasana making nayamkhale constitutional crisis will cause increased risk.

NC and UML, UML is the role of government in made?

Now that he has reached the place where the country's politics will rush to prejudge. However, the state government, the Congress and the UML, UML together to keep the role of a constructive opposition rucaula. UML initiating and implementing our special interest in the Constituent Assembly shall be made to protect the constitution. If they are ready to move forward in the direction of UML will be helpful. However, the country's long-term interests of the party before moving from the manyataviparita effect if he was trying to reach the toilet as demanded by the UML will not be acceptable. He must counter the powerful.

Implementation of the Constitution and the role of the Movement, while sitting in the opposition for a settlement of the difference?

Should the opposition came home, we aimed for the array. Paksma national interests and independence that stand between the people sitting in the opposition when mass is being praised even more easier it will be to go to the UML.

You are the first constituent assembly was the third party. Two ÷ two leaders became prime minister. Now, the Maoists tried to use that to make a difference?

If it does not distract from fallacies little different. Maoists for prime power in partnership with the alliance did not need to seek friendship with breaking new friends. Policy program and presenting the budget to the implementation of the constitution by the formation of the Maoist-led government could go to say. However, it is subject to terms of tyasaviparita UML came corner. However, UML national political complexity and risk of the condition is conscious. The role of a responsible move ahead.

The party sees this drama that sees the Indian role?

It is obvious that the theme of this discouraged. Since his role in drafting the constitution seeks to establish, Madhesi communities to use as your security bhenagardaka seeking, it is not standing success undeclared blockade element of this game that everyone understands the subject planner. For some of these things are met by immediate satisfaction but long term this trend topic due to instability and conflict is important to understand that.

The government received what was myandeda, as Madhesi movement, concerning implementation of the constitution agree that it has failed?

Destructive earthquakes, Madhesi movement and swampy blockade, the country could not do too much choice is true. On the other hand, some do not, some problems asahayogipanale vyurokresiko slow and must have generated. Started the implementation of the constitution process was bhaisakekai. If the implementation of the subject of federalism as the main Madhesi Front, to go with blocked due to be tried. The process to reach consensus by the UML he can not change that equation, those who understand the power that is not. Here is the implementation of the goal, the implementation of the constitution should not go over the purpose and interests, we tried to be the worry that the main thing.

UML leader even some of the government and are not satisfied with it?

The government should be more effective work, not much is true. In particular, the blockade of the supply system in order to make sober for a long time, the issue is seen Challenge. However, the supply of both inductive and shoulder the responsibility of Maoist. Escape the blame on others and ward?

Went out with the prime minister directly elected by the constituent assembly election agenda. Parliament agreed to his new constitution cuninegari. Parliamentary Law is something wrong with us more aware of what happened. Is likely to return to his electoral agenda?

It was linked to the old architecture of the Constituent Assembly. Direct elections to the constitution that would have prevented the crisis was not free. As far as the future political stability of the Constitution with regard to the provision of two years to bring no-confidence motion is. Proposal for a no confidence motion to bring the other to wait a year that has been mentioned. That must be presented when submitting a motion of the Prime Minister candidate has been mandatory provisions. It is certainly in the future may help to bring stability. As far as the directly elected prime minister in the new constitution had been prepared to go to the next option without weak. Our agenda is to leave the agreement for the construction of. Weakness in the past was brought not leaving.