Visayah court by Pau manahanima THT.
Kajikamanapa Vadanam. 10 Buddhanagar who advocate Dinesh Tripathi ....................... 1 applicant
Against the United Nepal Communist Party (Maoist) Chairman puspakamala Dahal (Prachanda), एकिकृतनेपालकम्यूनिष्टपार्टीकोमुख्यालय, Kajikamanapa Vadana. The opposition accuses Dahal of betrayal ............................... 35 The fees amounted to request the applicant herewith I entreat the following thread:
1. I have come to accede to the applicant for long time business law. The legal rule, constitutional supremacy, samajikanyaya, independent and capable judiciary, fundamental rights, such as being concerned about my professional as well as cooperation in such matters it is our duty and obligation of the court determines that such action before this court have been working to support.
2. An independent judiciary is the cornerstone of lawbreakers. They lack an independent judiciary in civil liberties, constitutional supremacy Abe Democratic regime could not be parsed. The judiciary is the greatest power of citizens asthaho react. Is a prasiddhabhanai.
Kinyayapalikako state coffers and military power (Purse and Sword) on no control. But the number of people react to the persistent belief that it is the largest property and destruction of Vrijji. Adalataprati if citizens trust the court will expire if it is impossible to judge the work of editing cycle. The most vulnerable part of the kingdom of Ur as the judiciary was calculated.
However, the protection of civil rights for the Judiciary played a significant bhumikaharuka wins due to increasing resistance because it is today the most important and the Kingdom of the Kingdom anyaangaharulai constitutional power to discipline, one that has already been established as part of completion. Uccarakhnu dignity of the court, to maintain its dignity and importance to be constantly active as a legal practitioner in my professional kartavyaho. The court decorum than to finish my personal dignity eutakanuna entrepreneurs as a serious threat to get on it.
3. Date 2073/2/1 maprakasita 'capital daily' The First Page 'peace process marmamai hit title "News prakasita with. Under the title puspakamala opposition Dahal (Prachanda) has been done to prakasita said. Capital Daily News printed the Opposition "Truth and Reconciliation Commission in accordance with the peace agreement should be in the range ddanddakalina cases decided by the route of the Peace Court samjhautabirudda the terrible conspiracy that oppose the decision not to accept the case .... ..... ddanddakalina Court should absorb prakriyalai change .. ... ddanddakalina cases decided as a regular event news we will by no means acceptable to the expression "the news has been published.
Similarly, the same day the date 2073/2/1 maprakasitahune 'civil dainikale "Night Court diusai underfoot" Daha said that the title of the property has been published. According to his own bipaksile "conclude the peace process has been tightened to make it active for the adalatalai .... now ready adalatalai maovadibirudda paridaicha, the court is working to make diusai night 'that is published by abhibyaktti.
And other audio-visual mediums, including the news prominently prakasita and is transmitted. The opposition of the theological court decorum and impartiality up thinking hard politic to reach the last, the court and against the threat Language prayogagari adalatalai serious fear may mean destruction of a court order, even refuses to publicly challenge by judicial process, a serious obstacle to khojiekole the Supreme Court Act, 2048 7 (1) in accordance with the request I took the present.
4. Nepal's Constitution Article 128 (4) the issue of a lawsuit by the Supreme Court interpretation of the Constitution and the law or any legal Theory All shall abide by. Or editing the work of his subordinate courts, the Supreme Court of Justice if no obstacles or if the order or decision that may be punished in accordance with law abahelanamakaravahi clear run to the Constitutional Court Law has provided dignity and reputation uccaprathamikata.
Court disregarded, disobedience to interrupt the work of justice and destruction Constitution as the offense is established. Pushpa Kamal Dahal opposition abhibyakttile own refutations of fairness, its constitutional role and a serious impact on visvasanita is reached. Continuation of the evidence presented themselves samaksaprastuta cases, decisions on the basis of the facts and the law. Someone has fallen purvagrahi court Yew (Fear and Favor) no. There are some universal value judgments and assumptions.
However, in accordance with the Constitution of the Kingdom pramukhakaryakaripradhanamantri as text Av pugekovyakti up a political party openly threatening the judiciary today kamabhaekochanija pramukhaddara bipaksile public entitled to make night work diusai Court, the court would not be acceptable expression of the great conspiracy of the court decision by parekoeva the dignity of the judiciary and the court order which refuses to deliver gambhiraksati by declaring the judiciary is a serious barrier.
A person who belongs not only the opposition parties will also be a ruling. Which declined by an organized political party organization and destruction power is given by the major dhataka paripresyama court activity such gairasambaidhanika how independent, impartial and fair judgment and destruction sakdcha to edit? How to ensure the implementation of the decisions in court can also be? From his constitutional duties towards the court case has given rise to a serious crisis. The court and the right to have noted the existing constitution and kanunaddhara is defined. If adalatalai nirbaha its constitutional role in what was revealed to interrupt said biddamana Constitution Ave. Constitution can not complete his promises failed to go through.
If the Constitution fails to sign the country anarchy and destruction as well as long volatility whole nation failed too. Today, the challenge is how a ruling coalition adalatalai netaddara one of Yew comprised of their legal responsibility to use when overall nyayapalikalai living in what may be a serious obstacle to the fact certain. This may be serious obstacle seems judiciary. Nyayaprakriyama obstruct present Constitution Ave. accordance with the law of criminal offenses.
Own the opposition of obstructing the process of the judiciary in accordance with the law have no right to own and destruction should be sajayabhagi the fact that in itself is clear. कुनैखासदलकाकार्याकर्ताहरुकोमुद्दादर्ताहुनैसक्दैन Yew members of a certain political party implies that from her criminal liability unmuktti downright mockery of the rule of law think. The law of equality before the law the same protection against destruction of the rule of law the basic Theory. According to George arvelako said at least equal to any or any more equal to us. According arveliyana uktti (All are equal but some are more equal) is equal to any more.
The judicial process is open upahasa said. Against certain political parties and the court can not see the evidence of fact and law on the basis of available guilty verdict would not have said the legal state and judicial freedom to give serious trailing. This judicial process is reacting to a serious interference and destruction ulladhana Obstruction ofjustice. Judicial intervention and destruction process is interrupted and an offense to the court manahani serious. This court reaches the ability to be sour. The judiciary is not a political party or its cadres sthanikaya apita their constitutional and legal obligations are subject to independent and able to sister. No matter how he went above the law is always higher than that.
5. The Prime Minister has already meeting the country's largest political party leader in the constitution Yew past this threat to disrupt the court to complete the constitutional obligation arising from the fact svayasiddha. This judicial process may be a serious obstacle to the fact that clear. This court is seriously feared to khajieko. An organized political daladdara adalatalai his constitutional duty to fulfill legal and destruction in what is constitutional democracy, not acceptable to not be a barrier.
The Unknown threats and destruction of activity is required in the course of a court zero tolerance. The court is a serious offense under criminal offenses are. The Indian Supreme Court HiraLalDixchit v. State of UP case, it is said - This is certainly an extraordinary power which must be sparingly exercised but where the public interest demands it, the court will not shrink from exercising it and important punishment even by punishment even by way of imprisonment in cases where a fine may not be adequate. (AIR 1954SC 743 (1955).
6. Therefore, as mentioned in the above mentioned special Pushpa Kamal Dahal prakaranaharuma court statement immediately swallowed and took sasarira upasthita summerised prakryaddhara the Supreme Court Act, 2048 7 (1) pursuant to intense (a year in jail and a fine of ten thousand) to punish the foot. Formed his own political party in accordance with the Constitution of the opposition leader of the ruling party because of major destruction, including punishment by the feet of rescheduled.
7 .Attached document
A) the word of the daily newspaper in the capital 207321
B) 207321 in civil Daily News published
8. It filed an application with the Court after the court proceedings while trying to be upasthita.
9. The application to register legal practitioner and has not retracted
10. It says this behavior is accurate and true. Bujhaumla sahumla false staying in accordance with law.
supplicant
Dinesh Tripathi
Ity conforms to 2073 years on May 2 Daily 1 Shubham
0 comments:
Post a Comment